Use ur common sense with these illitrate fools in media...

"All the powers in the universe are already ours. It is we who have put our hands before our eyes and cry that it is dark. " - Swami Vivekananda

We all must remember that no matter which saint do we consult today if they are gaining to mu...ch media attention towards themselves then let us not get ourselves involved with such people without receiving answer to some questions. Remember a true saint will always prefer to have peace and cut off himself from worldly affair and human beings. Meditation is their only aim and not promotion of self by creating dharamshala's . Today we have many controversial logics and even more controversial are the people spreading these logics.
When u choose your spiritual saint check :
1. any suspicious thing he/she may do
2. amount being charged from u is same or varies with time
3. is the work being done by them genuine and charity is being truly done
4. the answers they give and the ppl they hold are genuine as per common sense and not because by chance the 2 things coincided
5. if the guru is most interested in flaunting upon himself/herself
6. the amount paid by u I a one time payment or monthy or yearly and why and where is it being put
7. never have a low will use ur sense no matter what they guide u and then compare it to reality obviously samosssas bulbs and chatnees are no solution to a problem
8. always test words and actions so that u are not persuaded
9. enquire about the true and total amount they spent on a special occasion like the birthday of the fake radhamaa had crores for her ride
10. check if ur saint is travelling in expensive cars or ordinary vehicle and struggling to impart education.

RMEMBER : It is very difficult to find true saint like Sai BABA who lead the life of a saint today the gold on him is useless because a saint never wants anything for himself but only benefit for the

 nation

  

A small reserch might help... :)

Its the question of our own dignity and pride...
Not Only is the current attack on us being condemned but every attack from Pak on our pride our own INDIAN JAWANS is being condemned today. Have we ever wondered that a country like India that has the power to take down the entire country of pak why is it being belittled every time . Well on my research on the web I got a few answers to it which are... :-
1)The IsI has information of people with black money and many of politicians and big businessmen are involved in this scam
2)The politicians are playing a very diplomatic game with the nations the fight today is no longer a nuclear fight but a political fight for land and when a small country can control the entire world politics making U.S envy Iran then y should we lack behind in this race of minds
3)We are afraid to loose as Pak is being backed heavily by China, (For those who are unaware china is a country that is not a democratic nation and which is y it wants all the other nation around it to be the same this is also the reason of fight between nations around the china sea like japan) China has decided to grab A.P and as per its map A.P is a part of china, so is C.O.K and Tibet and the fight for grabbing more and more land from India is on because it knows that India wont ever retaliate and it is easy to press such nations that cant speak for its own so it indirectly funds Pak to do this
4)The Phonetics of Pak do not want what the people of Pak want that is to again make an undivided BHARAT and not 2 nations but the organisations dominate Afghan and Pak to such an extent that not only the peace treaties but also the other treaties have become a matter of loss for us
5)Pak is a fake democracy as it is actually made to offend India and if it makes peace its existence is a waste moreover the pak as a nation is governed by the commando general and not the real voice of people what we see isn't the reality in case of pak and its so called freedom...

 Solution as per me :
We must forget all our political barriers get together and respond back to the PAK in order to shut them up , we can not afford another mistake like POK in our life all over again ever

See More

A small reserch on Gandhian Black Money

There is no bigger taboo in India’s free press than asking hard and pointed questions of the Nehru-Gandhi family.  Few Indian journalists have ventured into this territory. Fewer still have asked the really uncomfortable questions. Questions that demand answers but have been conveniently ignored, dismissed and even forgotten.
Questions for example about Swiss bank accounts apparently held under the name of Smt. Sonia Gandhi containing approximately 2.5 billion SFr (~$2.7 billion) reported in the media more than 20 years back. Although the matter has been raised several times since (including in the print media), it has been met with a stonewall of arrogant silence.
More damning than the questions around Swiss accounts are allegations of funds having being paid by foreign intelligence agencies to Smt. Gandhi and members of the family going back more than 3 decades.  These allegations – to the best of my knowledge – have never been responded to, denied or contradicted. Neither has anyone filed a defamation suit alleging slander against the author of the book where these details were first mentioned.

Such questions abound. They also go a long way in the past. Such as questions around shares acquired by Smt. Gandhi in Indian companies in 1970 & 1974 (while still being a foreigner) in direct contravention of the infamous FERA (Foreign Exchange Regulation Act) which was in force at the time and violations of which could have led to imprisonment for up 7 years.
Or questions around the inconvenient fact that her name appears in the electoral register in 1983 (prepared on the basis of the voters’ list as of 1st Jan 1983) even though she first applied for Indian citizenship only on 7th April 1983.
Or questions around the apparently misleading information regarding her educational qualifications in the affidavit filed in 2004 which mentioned a course in English Language from “Cambridge University”?
Or questions around the basis for her becoming the head of “Jawaharlal Nehru Memorial Library and Museum, one of the principal institutions for research on contemporary Indian history” and the awkward, almost surreptitious manner in which she became a President for life of IGNCA, meticulously documented by the redoubtable Arun Shourie.
Or questions of the “Prince”? Such as his reported detention by FBI officials in Boston in late September 2001.
Or the remarkable increase in his total assets between 2004 and 2009 as declared in his affidavits filed with the Election Commission, even though he was engaged full-time in politics?
None of these questions have been publicly answered (to the best of my knowledge). None of the allegations have been openly challenged or followed up – neither by journalists, nor investigative reporters nor the opposition.
Particularly ominous is the thundering silence around disturbing questions to do with Smt. Gandhi, arguably the most powerful woman in India today.  Why has there been no discussion on these numerous transgressions and apparent violations?
Why is there no demand for any investigation? or even an explanation? Why are no questions asked? Why are the allegations dismissed with a practiced air of nonchalance?
What explains the thundering silence? And what is the price for this silence? 

Why the elevation of Narendra Modi is a positive sign for India

The BJP appointed Narendra Modi as the chairman of its 2014 campaign committee. While people will keep arguing over whether this indicates Modi becoming its PM candidate, one thing is clear: the party has bowed down to the voice of the majority of its cadres which have been clamouring for this for a long time now. And not just the BJP members, there is an increasing support for Modi among the people of India in general, irrespective of their party preferences.

A lot of senior BJP leaders are unhappy about this decision, it seems. Advani, in particular, was vehemently against the elevation of Modi and resigned from all party posts before other party leaders and the RSS head convinced him to return.
Advani has behaved extremely childishly throughout this whole episode. True, he had a huge hand in bringing the BJP to where it is, and at one point was its most popular leader (we do not need Digvijaya Singh to remind us of this), but he must realize that it is time for him to go. He is guilty of the very thing he accuses the party of: putting the needs and aspirations of the individual above those of the party and the nation. That his popularity has diminished over the years is obvious. As the de facto leader of the BJP’s poll campaigns in 2004 and 2009, he has seen its influence and seat tally grow smaller and smaller. The right time for him to resign was in 2009, after a disastrous campaign for which he was largely responsible. Over the years, though, Advani has come to occupy the kind of space in the BJP that the Gandhis do in the Congress: if they win, he takes credit and becomes PM; if they lose, he is not to blame and will fight the next election without learning the lessons of the previous one. But there is one crucial difference between Advani and the Gandhis – they have won elections.
After 2009, Advani has done nothing of note. His comments about Jinnah, his lacklustre leadership of the BJP in the Parliament (including the whole “apology” fiasco during the Assam discussion) and the random blog posts he keeps writing which make us wonder whether he hasn’t completely lost his marbles, all indicate a person increasingly incapable of leading a country which wants change, development and a new vision. He is a representative of the old guard of Indian politics – the kind who doesn’t care for what the people really want, the kind who doesn’t speak up unless there’s an election nearby, the kind who has nothing positive to contribute to the nation.
Democracy is not about tolerating the tantrums of senile old men. It is about recognizing the will of the people and working for their aspirations. Which is why the decision of the BJP – to accommodate Advani but not go back on its decision regarding Modi – is a welcome one.
Why this post concentrated so much on Advani was to highlight the reaction of other parties and the media to the resignation of Advani. So much has the discourse in our country shifted over the last twenty years that the same man who had been vilified and demonized all around as a murderer of minorities and destroyer of secularism is now considered an “acceptable” leader by the likes of the JD(U), which threatened to quit the NDA if Advani resigned from the BJP. The Congress is lamenting the departure of the same Advani it has bad-mouthed and portrayed as the biggest villain since Independence. All these crocodile tears have but two aims – to make people think that with Modi at the helm, the BJP is bound to lose; and to reach out to the minorities as if to say, “with Advani, BJP was awesome, but now with Modi it’s a mass-murdering fascist party out to kill all of you, and we are your only hope.”
The truth is, they’re all scared. Scared shitless. Because they know that if Modi is made the BJP’s unanimous PM candidate, they’re not going to stand a chance in 2014. When Advani was a political threat, he was communal. Now that his ABSENCE is a political threat, he’s suddenly become secular. And since Modi is a political threat, he’s the new communal kid on the block. This just goes to show how the concept of secularism has been used and modified at will by parties and the media for furthering their own agendas.

What the latest developments in the BJP show is that there is still some party in this country which can successfully and democratically engineer a passing of the baton from one generation to the next without involving bloodlines or splits. No significant party has been able to carry on without its founders or their descendants except for the BJP and the Communist parties (pre-Independence INC doesn’t count). And we would be damned as a nation if we only had Communist parties as practitioners of inner-party democracy. Some might call it washing of dirty linen in public, with the result being the party moving away from its roots. I call it healthy discussion and debate, with the result being a newer and stronger party emerging.
The BJP has shown that it can take decisive measures and an unequivocal stand to reinvent itself for the sake of the country. It’s time for other parties and the media to learn a lesson or two from it.